Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Lawyers for convicted Lockerbie bomber demand documents for appeal

The Associated Press

Published: October 11, 2007

 

 

 

EDINBURGH, Scotland: Lawyers for a former Libyan intelligence agent convicted of bombing Pan Am Flight 103 over Scotland in 1988 demanded at a preliminary appeal hearing Thursday that they be given official documents they say were kept from the defense during the trial.

Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi's legal team said nondisclosure of the documents by prosecutors indicated there had been "a miscarriage of justice."

Al-Megrahi, 55, who did not appear at the High Court for the hearing, has said he did not commit the atrocity, in which 259 people died, including 11 on the ground in Lockerbie, Scotland.

The Libyan's lawyers said Thursday that they need the documents to prepare their appeal, and they were granted an extension until Dec. 21, the 19th anniversary of the terrorist attack.

The defense claims that British and U.S. authorities tampered with evidence, disregarded witness statements and steered investigators away from evidence that the bombing was an Iranian-financed plot carried out by Palestinians to avenge the shooting down of a civilian Iranian airliner by U.S. forces several months earlier.

Al-Megrahi was convicted of the murders by a special Scottish court at a trial held in the Netherlands in 2001. He was and sentenced to life in prison, for a minimum of 22 years.

He lost his first appeal in 2002, but in June the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Board issued an 800-page document recommending that al-Megrahi receive a second appeal.

The Rev. Graham Forbes, the commission's chairman, said at the time: "Some of what we have discovered may imply innocence; some of what we have discovered may imply guilt. However, such matters are for a court to decide."

Thursday's 60-minute preliminary hearing was the first regarding the Libyan's second appeal.

While the families of some of the 179 American victims of the Lockerbie attack maintain al-Megrahi's guilt over the murders, many British families believe there was a miscarriage of justice.

Dr. Jim Swire, a Briton whose 19-year-old daughter Flora died in the attack, said in June: "I sat through the whole trial in Holland and by the end it was clear that Mr. Megrahi did not do it. I hope he is released soon."

Legal expert professor Robert Black of Edinburgh University has said the case was one of the most embarrassing in Scottish legal history. "The evidence does not show he had anything to do with the bombing. He should go free and he should never have been convicted," Black said in June.

Al-Megrahi is being held at a jail in Greenock, near Glasgow, and maintains he does not want to leave Scotland until his name is cleared. Local newspapers say Swire has visited him in prison.

The full appeal — before a panel of five judges — is expected to be held early in 2008.

...............................................................

Lockerbie: Case files requested
11/10/2007 18:24  - (SA)  

London - The case of a Libyan man convicted for the 1988 bombing of a US airliner over Lockerbie, Scotland, returned to court on Thursday, with his lawyers demanding access to files kept from his original defence team.

The procedural hearing at the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh was told that the non-disclosure of prosecution files could indicate a "miscarriage of justice" against the convicted man, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi.

Megrahi was convicted by a trio of Scottish judges sitting in a special court in the Netherlands of blowing up Pan Am Flight 103 on December 21 1988 by means of a bomb smuggled on board in a suitcase.

The 55-year-old, who was sentenced to 27 years in jail, did not attend Thursday's hearing, which is the first time his case has come to court since an independent review body in June said he should be granted a second appeal.

The former Libyan intelligence agent's legal team lodged a court order to force prosecutors to disclose the documents, which were supplied by an undisclosed foreign government.

His lawyer, Maggie Scott, told the court they were seeking two documents, one of which related to the supply of timers which allegedly exploded the bomb and was pivotal to his conviction.

She said the review body, the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission, concluded a "miscarriage of justice may have occurred" as a result of the non-disclosure.

"I can advise the material was originally provided to the UK government by the government of another country," she added.

Megrahi protests innocence

"It is clear to me that the Crown (prosecutors) are not yet prepared to release these documents.

"It is not at all clear to me what the basis is for the refusal."

Megrahi, who denied the charges and continues to protest his innocence, was jailed for 27 years. Another defendant was acquitted.

The explosion on the New York-bound flight killed all 259 people on board and 11 people on the ground in the southern Scottish town of Lockerbie in what was Britain's worst terrorist atrocity.

Megrahi, who is serving his sentence at Greenock jail, near Glasgow, western Scotland, lost a subsequent appeal against his conviction in 2002.

The SCCRC ruling that Megrahi could take his case to appeal judges for a second time cast doubt on some of the evidence which helped convict him, in particular that relating to an alleged visit to a clothes shop in Malta.

..........................................................

BBC News

Document plea in Lockerbie appeal

Lawyers for the man jailed for the Lockerbie bombing have asked the Crown to hand over documents which they said could help overturn his conviction.

A court was told their non-disclosure could indicate that Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi was the victim of a "miscarriage of justice".

The Libyan's legal team said it needed the documents to prepare its appeal.

They were granted an extension until the 21 December - the 19th anniversary of the disaster in 1988.

The hour-long hearing - which Megrahi did not attend - was the first time the case has come to court since he was granted the right to a second appeal earlier this year.

The full appeal - before a panel of five judges - is likely to be heard next year.

 

 

Dr Jim Swire (jim@swirefamily.net)