Secret
witness casts doubt over Lockerbie conviction
Severin
Guardian
Unlimited
|
|
|
Lawyers for a Libyan man covicted of killing 270 people in the Lockerbie bombing
have found a new witness who casts doubt on the reliability of the main
prosecution witness in the case.
Lawyers acting for Abdelbaset Ali
Mohmed al-Megrahi told an
appeal court hearing in
Mr Gauci's testimony at the trial in
Maggie Scott QC, al-Megrahi's
appeal lawyer, told three appeal judges yesterday there were substantial doubts
about the forensic evidence at his trial, the quality of his defence in 2001, the sufficiency of evidence against him
and the prosecution's failure to disclose key evidence which was uncovered by
the SCCRC and also supplied by the Maltese government.
As the Guardian disclosed last week, the Libyan's lawyers
also believe Mr Gauci was
offered a $2m (£980,000) reward from the
It also emerged yesterday that two secret documents, which
are understood to contradict prosecution claims that the Pan Am jet was blown
up using a Swiss-made timer, did not - as was widely believed - come from the
Jim Swire, the Lockerbie
campaigner whose daughter Flora died in the bombing, and Professor Robert
Black, the legal expert who devised the scheme to try al-Megrahi
at a neutral venue, the
They said the documents could instead either have come from
security services in
The lord advocate, Elish Angiolini, has been given until December 21 - the 19th
anniversary of the Lockerbie bombing - to produce the classified documents or
explain why they are being withheld.
Dr Jim Swire
(jim@swirefamily.net)