Zurich, June 25. 2000

COMPREHENSIVE REPORT AND JUDGMENT FROM CAMP ZEIST !

(from June 19 to 23, 2000, by crown-witness Edwin Bollier, MEBO INC.)

1) The Court in Camp Zeist:

The infrastructure of the Scottish court in Camp Zeist-Holland is superb. Particularly the technical installations with the computer-screens are first-rate to project evidence, protocols and pictures, etc. The language-translation-system and the interpreters were sublime, It was negligible and understandable that we encountered certain minor time-problems with the translation into Arabic.

2) The High Jurisdiction, The Court:

The Supreme Judges, Lords, the Crown displayed professionalism and conveyed total trustworthiness and sense for justice.

3) The Prosecution;

The prosecution had performed a very exacting preparatory task, which was absolutely professionally presented by Mr. Alan Turnbull,QC. The events covering several timely different incidents were very clearly shown, not being used to conceal speculative structures or unneccessary and untrue stories. The witness Edwin Bollier was not prepared to accept the represented evidence-introduction of the MST-13 timer fragment.

4) The Defence;

a, Defense-team for the defendant Mr. Abdel Baset al Megrahi:

The defense team, Mr. Alistair Duff and Mr. David Burns, QC, have totally failed according to my Judgment!
Despite the fact that Edwin Bollier from MEBO INC. had handed the complete MEBO research-analysis results, (collected and worked out during the past 8 years), at no cost at all to the defense-team, this defense-team did not seem to be able to apply this material in full discharge for the suspects: Megrahi and Fhima. Assuming that these lawyers do not possess sufficient technical and physical knowledge;- as well as having missed to consult special experts for proper and timely assistance, very significant and discharging arguments have not been heard.

Example:
The allegedly Lockerbie-discovered fragment from a MST-13 MEBO timer.

Following his testimony in Camp Zeist, E Bollier was once more permitted to view and examine the original MST-13 timer-fragment that was allegedly recovered from the field of debris in Lockerbie. The discoveries during this viewing of the fragment clearly underlines all prior research- results, confirming that the fragment is from a brown-colored PC-board off a prototype- MST-13 timer, of which none was ever delivered to Libya!

Edwin Bollier informed the High Court that the brown-colored timer fragment no. DP 35B, which he was able to first view and examine back in September of 1999 in Dumfries (in the presence of prosecutors Ms. Watson and Mr.Harvie), had once more been manipulated, possibly by Scottish forensic experts. The then clearly brown-colored piece of evidence (so often called: most crucial piece of evidence!) is now a totally charcoaled PC-bord, no longer displaying the original color!

A criminal complaint against persons yet unknown (but likely from the forensic team), for the incredible manipulation with this very significant and crucial piece of evidence, has been verbally presented by E. Bollier to prosecutors Ms. Watson and Mr. Harvie.

The first segment of the allegedly Lockerbie-recovered MST-13 timer fragment has also been severely altered by extreme fire-/heat! It has been shortened sideways by about 0,4mm;- presumably to make it fit the fragment shown on a photograph by FBI-forensic expert Tomas Thurman, namely a fragment from a brown MST-13 timer prototype! When it was obvious that no brown-colored MST-13 prototype-timer?-PC-board had ever been delivered to Libya (possibly informed by Ulrich Lumpert's technical description), a duplicate green-colored fragment was then being prepared in order to keep intact the link to Libya! it was unfortunately omitted to also replace the brown part no. DP35b with a green replacement! E.Bollier assumes that the renewed, heavy burning of this piece of evidence DP35b served the simple purpose to hide the actual color of the PC baseboard plate !

Depute Alan Turnbull's explanation that forensic experts had to cut a 0,4mm strip sideways off this fragment for forensic testing, is not correct to my estimation!

Why? Firstly because the forensic fragment had already been cut into two pieces, and secondly because the alleged 0,4mm-cut-off was made from a side that would remain in a same form and shape after the cut! There was absolutely no forensic reason to shorten the already tiny fragment.
There is also the legal question whether such a prominent and crucial piece of evidence can be allowed in court, following such severe manipulation by the forensic experts !

Example 2:
Was there an explosion from within container AVE 4041 PA?

Edwin Bollier-/MEBO INC. can answer this question with a clear NO, following undivided support of top forensic explosives experts from the Fraunhofer Institute (Prof. Dr. Hitmar Schubert/Munich,Germany) who used the MEBO analysis-results for their own (slightly differing) clear definition, placing the centre of explosion decidedly outside said container AVE 4041 PA;- near Pos.700. This centre-of-explosion position is also supported by another circumstantial piece of evidence- two sheet- metal angle- pieces from the front-side of this container (slantaide/door-opening, meeting on the right side, next to the floor) have quite obviously received burning?and other damage from an outside explosion I furthermore refer to the MEBO Internet-publication: -'There was no explosion inside container AVE 4041 PA", which is still fully valid!

Here again we notice that the defense?team has totally missed the opportunity to use incredibly clean factual evidence to force about the dropping of the charges-/indictment against Megrahi and Fhima! Lacking the necessary technical support from top-qualified experts, the defense-lawyers were not even in a position to introduce the proper questions regarding this subject ! Another, parallel situation then also developed with the Toshiba radio "Bombeat" 801 6/RF16...

MEBO contends that any other, straight-forward and totally unbiased defense-team would have eagerly grabbed for the series of clear, visible evidence that MEBO was offering, after very thorough and extremely intensive in-house research that lasted for so many years;  this evidence being: the MST-13 MEBO-timer fragment, the explosion-research, placing the centre of explosion outside container AVE 4041 PA and the research regarding the manipulated Toshiba Bombeat radio ! Relatively low-cost financial expenses (compared to the incredibly high cost that the defense-strategy has cost todate) would so easily and clearly have produced the total dropping of all charges against the two Libyans, all based on visible, down-to earth clear evidence !

My proposal: selection of a new defense-team, consisting of one lawyer for each suspect, with proper credentials to act before the court in Camp Zeist, two additional lawyers with top-air-disaster experience, as well as five top-experts in the field of physics, explosives and mechanical science!
This special team must then be exclusively charged with the thorough inquest into these three special subjects of visible evidence !

Producing the summary of a TV-soap opera, naming Ost-Berlin, the ex-DDR and Stasi,  cryptograph apparatus, secret morse-code-connections to the CIA in Washington, etc. David Burns, QC (defending one of the accused: Abdelbaset Ali Mohamed al-Megrahi) made an all-out effort to totally ridicule and discredit the witness Edwin Bollier! This agent-story reminding of the cold-war era may have been a colorful scene for the court-room audience, but his effort was utterly deplorable and incredibly naive! Much of such a defense-effort can at best be called meager, and the insulting questioning, name-calling and scenario-building were all shots in the dark! No positive points could thus be accumulated for the suspect A.Megrahi!
 

b)- Defense-team for the suspect?/accused: Khalifa Fhimah

The defense-team, headed by Mr. Richard Kenn, QC, was obviously so much delighted over the "agent-story" focusing onto the DDR in his publik, intimidating the the witness Edwin Bollier and attempting to push him backwards into a corner with one lio after another! The pile-up of lies culminated in the assertion, that E. Bollier had been in East Berlin on January 5, 1989 to receive the order from a STASI-officer, to write the letter incriminating Libya for the PanAm-103 disaster;and to then send such letter to the CIA. Mr. Keen then claimed that the "mystery-man! who visited MEBO on December 30, 1988 was no more then pure invention and imagination of E.Bollier!

Mr. Richard Keen then did receive a final hammer-sign by Attorney General Mr. Alan Turnbull, QC, who then confirmed in favor of E.Bollier that the date in the protocol of the Scottish police was corrected in 1991;. and that E.Bollier was in fact arriving in East-Berlin on January 20, 1989 only ! At this time, the trap-setting letter to the CIA already been dropped at the US-embassy in Vienna, in order to very possibly uncover the identity of the mystery-man!

Lawyer Richard Keen's publik was also very week and naive, fully missed the intended target and did not harvest any positive points for the defendant Fhimah! it is quite interesting to mention that that the CIA has concealed the facts about the morse-code-contact with MEBO and the trap-setting letter (ordered to be typed by said "mystery-man", using the typewriter for for Spanish language), not even revealing such information to the official team searching for the truth in the Lockerbie-affair! It was only after the letter was being discussed during E.Bollier's visit to Washington, when E.B. was asking US-legal attaché Robert Fanning who Mr. Weidman was, that the FBI and Scottish Police had actually been informed! Why?

MEBO has now been trying to seek the full truth behind the incredible atrocity of the Lockerbie-bom bing, conducting elaborate researchactivities whose results have now come very close to exposing the incredible secrets that for so long have been kept locked away in dire attempts to protect the true culprits! But it is the soap-opera stories produced by defense-teams that show once more that nobody seems to be truthfully interested in uncovering even the last possible secret behind the Lockerbie-tragedy! If such an interest would exist, then the defense-teams would concentrate on the crucial, visible evidence first, in order to finally see the main-door for honest, undisputable facts open wide and clear!

5.-TV- Radio-and Print-Media

Some news-media seem to be quite irritated after the defense-teams introduced the "soap-opera-agent-story", and they believe that such a letter from MEBO INC. to the CIA had triggered the indictment.

THIS IS NOT SO !

Why? Well before Libya-/the Libyan suspects were indicted on November 14, 1991, all details regarding this trap-setting letter had been totally unravelled by February 1990! Therefore, this phantom-letter was from that date on no longer an instrument to claim that Libya was in any way involved with the Lockerbie-plot! Despite this fact, the indictment was then being served. Should we not remember an other Libya-US-agent from Malta, crown-witness Mr. Jacca?? Which "mystery-man" or organisation actually did contact Jacca to have him oonorotoly accuse the two Libyan suspects ??? May be we will learn this existing real-life agent-story from the proceedings at Camp Zeist !

Libya, too had been thoroughly informed of this phantom-letter back in 1992. This trap-setting letter to the CIA was therefore absolutely no sensational news-item, when heralded into the court-room at Camp Zeist!

Edwin Bollier and his defense-crew
from MEBO INC.